Persons having a restricted license as a result of a DUI conviction may only operate a vehicle at specified times, and violation of the terms is a misdemeanor.
Police often prowl the Internet to identify potential child molesters to entice them into meetings where they are arrested based on Internet chats they have with the accused. Now, we are seeing the social networks such as Facebook, MySpace and YouTube are being monitored by police investigators. This month, several Washington state police agencies trolling Facebook raided a teenager's party based on postings from friends of the host. Several people were arrested for DUI and underage possession of alcohol.
Richmond-area drivers will be arrested for DUIDWI in larger numbers this Labor Day weekend as Virginia State Police, and local law enforcement agents in Henrico, Chesterfield, Goochland, and Hanover counties will be increasing the numbers of patrol officers and adding sobriety checkpoints in an effort to nab drivers who may have overindulged.
In Virginia, misdemeanor offenses are those that are punished by no more than a year in prison. Many misdemeanors are punishable by fines, with no jail time. Find out what punishments are for if you are convicted of a misdemeanor offense in Virginia.
Think your Virginia DUI/DWI arrest is not worth the cost of hiring an aggressive attorney to stand up for your rights and contest the evidence against you? Think again after you consider the fact that over a 3-year period, a DUI lab's testing errors help send 9 people to jail in Colorado!
Virginia's "implied consent" law requires persons arrested for DUI/DWI to submit to a chemical test of their breath or blood to determine whether there is present evidence of unlawful amounts of alcoholic beverages, or drugs. A veteran Virginia DUI/DWI lawyer explains what the "implied consent" law means, and how the results may be challenged in court.
Virginia's "implied consent" law requires any person operating a motor vehicle on the highway to submit to a blood or breath test if arrested for DUI/DWI.
Taking a preliminary breath test (PBT) when stopped for suspicion of DUI in Virginia is not usually wise. Preliminary breath tests are voluntary, but can be used against you in court to prove the officer had probable cause to arrest for DUI or DWI.
Virginia's implied consent law requires those arrested for DUI to submit to breathalyzer tests. However, an experienced and aggressive DUI lawyer may help you win your case.
The Virginia Senate's Transportation Committee yesterday approved Bills that would alter speed limits, and existing law on seat belt and cell phone use.
Knowing your rights during a traffic stop for suspicion of DUI can aid your case if you are charged. And, you will likely be charged, but perhaps not convicted. Two clients recently told me that by using the recommendation made to them by their attorney they avoided being charged and or convicted of DUI.
Reckless Driving and Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in Virginia are Class 1 misdemeanors. In Virignia, a Class 1 misdemeanor is punishable by a term in jail of up to 12 months, and a fine of up to $2500.00, either or both.
In addition to going on one's driving records, a conviction for DUI or Reckless Driving in Virginia will also go on one's criminal record, or "rap sheet."
Therefore, it is a good idea to confer with an attorney soon after you have been charged with either one of these offenses. An attorney can evaluate your case, with a mind to exploring what defenses you may have to the charges, and how he or she may be able to have the charge reduced to a lesser offense.
Some attorneys offer consultations for free, others charge a nominal fee. But don't be swayed by the cost, because a skilled, aggressive, courtroom battler is what you probably want, not a novice who may go to sleep at the wheel and overlook a chance to get you the best result possible.
An allegedly intoxicated driver traveling the wrong way on I-264 in Virginia injured two people after crashing into their car. He then hit a state trooper who was trying to block his travel.
About 1 a.m., state police received several calls about a driver heading west in the eastbound lanes of I-264 near Laskin Road, said Sgt. Michelle Cotten, a state police spokeswoman.
The driver crashed the 1992 Lexus he was driving into a sedan carrying two people, who suffered minor injuries and were taken to a hospital, according to a news release
He then hit the patrol vehicle of Virginia State Trooper L.C. White, who had angled his car along the interstate’s left lane and shoulder in an attempt to stop the Lexus. The driver hit the trooper head-on, and he suffered minor injuries, according to the release.
The driver then traveled another 100 yards before his vehicle came to a stop, according to the release.
White arrested 44-year-old Cleveland N. Robertson of Hampton and charged him with driving under the influence, two counts of felony hit and run and driving the wrong way, according to the release
Two Florida attorneys are challenging their state's use of the Intoxilyzer 8000 breath testing device that is being brought into Virginia to replace the oft-criticized Intoxilyzer 5000 that has been in use for several years to prove a suspect's Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC). They claim that the machine is inherently inaccurate, produces false readings, and that it should not be the basis for DUI convictions.
Because blood tests to determine a suspected impaired driver's BAC is no longer optional in Virginia, the Intoxilyzer 5000 test result has been the key piece of evidence used to convict in Virginia when the reading is 0.08 or higher. The margin of error for the Intoxilyzer 5000 is alleged to be "only" +/- 0.02, but the tests results have been acceptable in the courts. As a result of this inaccuracy, people whose BACs are 0.08 or 0.09 are being convicted of DUI even though their actual BAC may be lower than 0.08, such as 0.07 or 0.06.
Traffic accident statistics compiled by the Virginia State Police (VSP) for calendar year 2007 (the most recent reporting period) dispel popular belief that alcohol is involved in most accidents.
Of the 145,405 auto crashes in that year, only 7,019 drivers out of 265,589 involved were deemd to have been "impaired." That is 2.9 per cent of the total crashes. The statistics for that year indicate that 97 percent of the drivers involved in crashes were not impaired by alcohol.
These percentages were consistent with those reported the previous year. Of 279,505 drivers involved in the 151,692 crashes reported in 2006, 7,392 drivers were impaired. Though the number of impaired drivers was higher than in 2007, the percentage of impaired drivers involved in auto accidents was 2.9 percent, and 97 percent of the crashes did not involve drunk drivers.
Begin your case review by filling out the form below or call us at 1-804-726-4778.
Law Chambers of Anton J. Stelly
P.O. Box 11276
6002A West Broad Street
Suite 205
Richmond, Virginia 23230-1276
Phone: (804) 726-4778
Fax: (804) 726-4779 Get Directions