No!   However, there are exceptions to this rule.  If you are under arrest, the police may search you thoroughly. This is known as a search incident to an arrest.  There is also the  Terry  stop search. This is limited in scope.  First, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot, to justify stopping and questioning a person. Then, if the officer reasonably believes the person is armed with a weapon, the officer may pat down the outer clothing of the person to determine if the person is in possession of a weapon that could be used against the officer. If, in doing this pat down, the officer feels what he believes to be a weapon, he may go into the pockets to confirm or deny his belief. If the search is challenged, a judge will determine whether the officer acted properly and if the evidence seized is admissible as evidence.  Last, the person may consent to a search. No warrant is required if a citizen  freely  consents to a search of his person, automobile, business, or home. If the consent to search is challenged, a judge will determine whether the officer acted properly and if the evidence seized is admissible as evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

 


Q: Can the police reach into the pockets of my pants or jacket without a search warrant?

A: No!

However, there are exceptions to this rule.

If you are under arrest, the police may search you thoroughly. This is known as a search "incident to" an arrest.

There is also the "Terry stop" search. This is limited in scope.  First, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that there is "criminal activity afoot," to justify stopping and questioning a person. Then, if the officer reasonably believes the person is armed with a weapon, the officer may pat down the outer clothing of the person to determine if the person is in possession of a weapon that could be used against the officer. If, in doing this pat down, the officer feels what he believes to be a weapon, he may go into the pockets to confirm or deny his belief. If the search is challenged, a judge will determine whether the officer acted properly and if the evidence seized is admissible as evidence.

Last, the person may consent to a search. No warrant is required if a citizen freely consents to a search of his person, automobile, business, or home. If the consent to search is challenged, a judge will determine whether the officer acted properly and if the evidence seized is admissible as evidence.


Bookmark and Share

Free Reports

Free Case Evaluation

Begin your case review by filling out the form below or call us at 1-804-726-4778.

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Law Chambers of Anton J. Stelly
P.O. Box 11276
6002A West Broad Street
Suite 205
Richmond, Virginia 23230-1276
Phone: (804) 726-4778
Fax: (804) 726-4779

Get Directions

FAQs