Many times confessions are not reliable because they have been obtained by police misconduct. Former FBI agent and Virginia criminal defense attorney, Tony Stelly, discusses the intricacies of the constituional rights one must be given under Miranda v. Arizona before being questioned by police while he is in custody or under arrest. Included are the right to remain silent, the right to have an attorney present during questioning, and the waiver of such rights.

Miranda RIghts Must Be Knowingly Waived When Questioned by Police

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present before you answer any questions, and if you do not have an attorney or cannot afford to hire one, an attorney may be appointed for you. Do you wish to waive these rights and speak to us?"

How many times have you heard these words on television shows or in the movies? Countless times! However, many people, especially juveniles, do not really know what the words mean, or why it is important to keep quiet until they have had a chance to confer with a lawyer.

Although for many years before, FBI agents had routinely been advising suspects of these rights prior to questioning them, it was not until the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Miranda v. Arizona in 1967 that this FBI practice became “the law of the land.” The reason for the change is that police officers sometimes obtained confessions that were unreliable because the person questioned was ignorant of his right not to answer questions put to him by police, did not realize that trained police officers questioning him were not just “chewing the fat” or “needing your help in solving a case,” but were trying to make a case against him; nor that they used tactics to overcome his will and coerce a confession, including in some cases, deprivations of such things as sleep, food, water and bathroom use in order to get a confession.

If a person gives a confession in violation of his Miranda rights, that confession cannot be used against him in court. It’s as simple as that! But not all questioning by police requires a Miranda warning. The Miranda warnings have to be given before questioning begins after the person is in custody. Note, I did not say, “under arrest.” A person under arrest is certainly “in custody.” However, a person is “in custody” when the police have indicated to him either verbally or in some other manner that he is not free to leave or walk away from them – even if they say, “you’re not under arrest.”

Therefore, before answering any questions posed by the police, the first thing you should ask is if you are free to leave without answering any questions. If the answer is ”no,” then decline to answer them until you confer with an attorney. You may be glad you did!


Bookmark and Share

Free Reports

Free Case Evaluation

Begin your case review by filling out the form below or call us at 1-804-726-4778.

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Law Chambers of Anton J. Stelly
P.O. Box 11276
6002A West Broad Street
Suite 205
Richmond, Virginia 23230-1276
Phone: (804) 726-4778
Fax: (804) 726-4779

Get Directions

FAQs